Home › Laundry Detergent › Era › Era 3X Oxibooster
Latest three-month snapshot through 2026-07-21 · 1 wave. Use the controls above to change the window.
Laundry Detergent · 1 wave · n=120 answers, pooled
How often each model brings the brand up in recommendation answers.
| model | share of voice | answers |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 3% | 1 of 40 |
| Claude | 3% | 1 of 40 |
| Gemini | 0% | 0 of 40 |
Wave-by-wave share of recommendation answers that named this brand.
| wave | share of voice | answers | change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | 2% | 2 of 120 |
5 exact quoted mentions in this snapshot, grouped by coded tone. Recent quotes are deduplicated and mixed across models.
“Testing shows these detergents are barely more effective at removing stains than plain water. Buying them is usually a false economy.”
“Consumer Reports found **Era 3X Oxibooster** performed poorly despite its cheap per-load price.”
“Consumer Reports flags Era 3X Oxibooster as a particularly poor performer, so it may not save money if you need extra detergent or rewashes”
“flagged...as a weaker performer among liquid detergents tested”
“despite being inexpensive, ranked at the bottom of Consumer Reports' recent liquid-detergent ratings”
Which competitors models suggest when shoppers ask for something cheaper.
Method: fixed shopper questions asked repeatedly to Claude, OpenAI GPT and Gemini with web search on. Shares are the percentage of recommendation answers mentioning the brand. Quotes are AI outputs; full transcripts are kept as receipts.