Home › Laundry Detergent › Era
Latest three-month snapshot through 2026-07-21 · 1 wave. Use the controls above to change the window.
Laundry Detergent · 1 wave · n=120 answers, pooled
How often each model brings the brand up in recommendation answers.
| model | share of voice | answers |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 3% | 1 of 40 |
| Claude | 3% | 1 of 40 |
| Gemini | 0% | 0 of 40 |
Wave-by-wave share of recommendation answers that named this brand.
| wave | share of voice | answers | change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-21 | 2% | 2 of 120 |
6 exact quoted mentions in this snapshot, grouped by coded tone. Recent quotes are deduplicated and mixed across models.
“Consumer Reports found **Era 3X Oxibooster** performed poorly despite its cheap per-load price.”
“I'd avoid choosing Era purely for price; Consumer Reports rated its 3X Oxibooster at the bottom of its liquid-detergent ratings.”
“flagged...as a weaker performer among liquid detergents tested”
“Testing shows these detergents are barely more effective at removing stains than plain water. Buying them is usually a false economy.”
“despite being inexpensive, ranked at the bottom of Consumer Reports' recent liquid-detergent ratings”
Which competitors models suggest when shoppers ask for something cheaper.
Method: fixed shopper questions asked repeatedly to Claude, OpenAI GPT and Gemini with web search on. Shares are the percentage of recommendation answers mentioning the brand. Quotes are AI outputs; full transcripts are kept as receipts.